Log In Create Account
Catalog Search

Site Search

Search codals, syllabus topics, and practice questions from one prompt.

24 matches Prompt active

Results for “Fact Application”

24 catalog matches
Question MPT | Objective Memorandum | ESSAY Medium

An MPT asks for the discussion section of an objective memorandum analyzing whether a store owed a duty to protect a...

...ary includes a statute and three cases. One case lists foreseeability factors, one applies those factors to repeated prior incidents, and one finds no duty where the prior events were too different. The File includes two...

Citations: NCBE MPT preparation materials, NCBE MPT test-day instructions

Question MPT | Persuasive Brief | ESSAY Medium

An MPT task memo asks you to draft the legal argument for a brief in support of a motion to compel arbitration. Your...

...n. Discuss required sections, point headings, application of the File facts, response to unconscionability, and why the answer should not be written as an objective memorandum or client letter. This essay tests the diffe...

Citations: NCBE MPT preparation materials, NCBE MPT overview

Question MPT | Using the File and Library | ESSAY Hard

An MPT asks you to draft a client letter about whether a nonprofit may remove a director for missing meetings. The Li...

...istracting authorities, and application of the legal standard to File facts. This essay tests disciplined use of supplied legal authorities and rejection of outside law. NCBE MPT preparation materials, NCBE MPT test-day...

Citations: NCBE MPT preparation materials, NCBE MPT test-day instructions

Question MPT | Using the File and Library | ESSAY Medium

An MPT task memo asks you to draft an objective memorandum analyzing whether a city may revoke a food truck permit. T...

...the student use the File and Library instead? Discuss the task memo, fact selection, legal source selection, treatment of distracting materials, and integration of facts with the supplied authorities. This essay tests d...

Citations: NCBE MPT preparation materials, NCBE MPT test-day instructions

Question Torts | Products Liability | MULTIPLE_CHOICE Easy

A beverage manufacturer intended each bottle of juice to contain only pasteurized juice. One bottle was contaminated...

A beverage manufacturer intended each bottle of juice to contain only pasteurized juice. One bottle was contaminated with cleaning fluid because a valve malfunctioned on the filling line. A consumer bought that bottle fr...

Citations: NCBE MBE Subject Matter Outline, Torts, Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability

Question Torts | Products Liability | MULTIPLE_CHOICE Easy

A consumer proves that a blender had a defective switch when it left the manufacturer. The consumer was injured when...

...mer proves that a blender had a defective switch when it left the manufacturer. The consumer was injured when she slipped on water across the kitchen while carrying the unopened blender box, before ever using or opening...

Citations: NCBE MBE Subject Matter Outline, Torts, Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability

Question Business Associations | Shareholder Rights and Derivative Suits | MULTIPLE_CHOICE Medium

A corporation proposes to sell its only factory and all operating equipment to a competitor, leaving the corporation...

A corporation proposes to sell its only factory and all operating equipment to a competitor, leaving the corporation with cash and no operating business. Which statement best describes shareholder rights in the transacti...

Citations: Model Business Corporation Act asset-sale and appraisal principles

Question Torts | Intentional Torts | MULTIPLE_CHOICE Medium

A defendant deliberately caused contact during a confrontation but denied any desire to injure. The facts are close,...

...d contact during a confrontation but denied any desire to injure. The facts are close, and both sides can cite a rule that appears favorable. What should a strong answer do first? Correct. Intentional torts require inten...

Citations: Battery, assault, false imprisonment, trespass doctrines

Question Criminal Law and Procedure | Defenses | MULTIPLE_CHOICE Medium

A hiker found an arrowhead on federal park land. A criminal statute prohibited removing artifacts from the park, but...

...head on federal park land. A criminal statute prohibited removing artifacts from the park, but the hiker had read a private travel website stating that visitors could keep small finds. The hiker took the arrowhead home a...

Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law, Model Penal Code 2.04

Question Evidence | Relevance and Rule 403 | ESSAY Hard

A homeowner sues a space-heater manufacturer after a heater ignited curtains in her bedroom. She claims the heater's...

A homeowner sues a space-heater manufacturer after a heater ignited curtains in her bedroom. She claims the heater's tip-over switch failed when the heater fell on thick carpet. The manufacturer denies defect and argues...

Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Evidence, Fed. R. Evid. 401, Fed. R. Evid. 402, Fed. R. Evid. 403

Question Business Associations | Agency and Partnerships | MULTIPLE_CHOICE Medium

A manager signed a supply agreement after receiving mixed instructions from the owner. The facts are close, and both...

...pply agreement after receiving mixed instructions from the owner. The facts are close, and both sides can cite a rule that appears favorable. What should a strong answer do first? Correct. Agency arises from assent and c...

Citations: Restatement (Third) of Agency sections 1.01, 2.01, 2.03, 4.01

Question Business Associations | Agency and Partnerships | ESSAY Hard

A manager signed a supply agreement after receiving mixed instructions from the owner. Two legally significant facts...

...receiving mixed instructions from the owner. Two legally significant facts point in different directions and the decision maker must determine which fact controls. The opponent argues that a bright-line label decides th...

Citations: Restatement (Third) of Agency sections 1.01, 2.01, 2.03, 4.01

Question Contracts | UCC Article 2 Basics | MULTIPLE_CHOICE Medium

A manufacturer agreed to provide a restaurant with 20 custom ovens and to install them. The ovens accounted for most...

A manufacturer agreed to provide a restaurant with 20 custom ovens and to install them. The ovens accounted for most of the contract price, and the installation was routine. A dispute later arose over whether Article 2 a...

Citations: UCC 2-102, UCC 2-105, NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Contracts

Question Contracts | Consideration and Promissory Estoppel | MULTIPLE_CHOICE Hard

A merchant furniture manufacturer sent a signed email to a hotel stating, "We offer to sell 200 desks for $500 each....

A merchant furniture manufacturer sent a signed email to a hotel stating, "We offer to sell 200 desks for $500 each. This offer will remain open for six months." The hotel paid nothing for the promise to keep the offer o...

Citations: UCC 2-205, NCBE MBE Subject Matter Outline, Contracts, NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Contracts

Question Torts | Products Liability | MULTIPLE_CHOICE Medium

A prescription drug has a known risk of liver injury in patients with a certain condition. The manufacturer provides...

...wn risk of liver injury in patients with a certain condition. The manufacturer provides a detailed warning about that risk to prescribing physicians. A patient sues, arguing that the manufacturer should have personally w...

Citations: NCBE MBE Subject Matter Outline, Torts, Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability

Question Civil Procedure | Summary Judgment | ESSAY Hard

A warehouse worker sued a chemical manufacturer in federal court, alleging that fumes from a cleaning solvent caused...

A warehouse worker sued a chemical manufacturer in federal court, alleging that fumes from a cleaning solvent caused permanent lung injury. After a full discovery period, the manufacturer moved for summary judgment. The...

Citations: Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a), Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e), Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

Question Civil Procedure | Personal Jurisdiction | ESSAY Hard

AlpineGear GmbH, a German company, manufactures brake clips for ski bindings. AlpineGear sells all clips to a German...

AlpineGear GmbH, a German company, manufactures brake clips for ski bindings. AlpineGear sells all clips to a German assembler, which sells completed bindings to an independent distributor in New York. AlpineGear has no...

Citations: World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro, Walden v. Fiore

Question Supplemental - Not MEE July 2026 | Approaches and Interest Analysis | ESSAY Hard

Borrower is a small manufacturer incorporated and headquartered in State L. Bank is headquartered in State M. Bank's...

Borrower is a small manufacturer incorporated and headquartered in State L. Bank is headquartered in State M. Bank's loan officer traveled to State L, inspected Borrower's factory, and negotiated most loan terms there. B...

Citations: Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws, Modern governmental-interest analysis

Question Civil Procedure | Jurisdiction and Venue | MULTIPLE_CHOICE Medium

Events occurred in two districts while the plaintiff filed in a third district chosen for convenience. The facts are...

...e the plaintiff filed in a third district chosen for convenience. The facts are close, and both sides can cite a rule that appears favorable. What should a strong answer do first? Correct. Venue is proper in a district a...

Citations: 28 U.S.C. 1391, 28 U.S.C. 1404, 28 U.S.C. 1406

Question Criminal Law and Procedure | Substantive Crimes | ESSAY Hard

The prosecution charged an offense after disputed facts raised questions about intent, causation, and grading. After...

The prosecution charged an offense after disputed facts raised questions about intent, causation, and grading. After an initial agreement or ruling, later conduct created ambiguity about whether the required legal elemen...

Citations: Common law criminal doctrine, Model Penal Code offense principles, Due process proof-beyond-a-reasonable-doubt doctrine