...r states the common-law robbery rule. NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law, Model Penal Code 222.1
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law, Model Penal Code 222.1
...spiracy survival, and Wharton's Rule. NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law, Model Penal Code 5.01, Model Penal Code 5.02, Model Penal Code 5.03, Model Penal Code 5.05
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law, Model Penal Code 5.01, Model Penal Code 5.02, Model Penal Code 5.03, Model Penal Code 5.05
...states when solicitation is complete. NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law, Model Penal Code 5.02
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law, Model Penal Code 5.02
...s, plain view, and cell-phone limits. NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Procedure, U.S. Const. amend. IV, Arizona v. Gant, Cali...
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Procedure, U.S. Const. amend. IV, Arizona v. Gant, California v. Acevedo, United States v. Ross, Riley v. California, South Dakota v. Opperman
...the strongest arguments for each side, state the controlling rule for criminal offense elements and punishment, apply it to the material facts, and explain the likely remedy or consequence. This essay tests criminal offe...
Citations: Common law criminal doctrine, Model Penal Code offense principles, Due process proof-beyond-a-reasonable-doubt doctrine
...in State S. Cyclist sued Driver in State R court. State R's choice-of-law rules select State S negligence law for liability. State S uses modified comparative fault and bars recovery if plaintiff is more than 50 percent...
Citations: Conflict-of-laws principles, Erie doctrine principles
...the strongest arguments for each side, state the controlling rule for criminal law and procedure: Constitutional Procedure, apply it to the material facts, and explain the likely remedy or consequence. This essay tests c...
Citations: Common law criminal doctrine, Model Penal Code principles, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment criminal procedure doctrine
...peared at trial, but the judge excluded her testimony because Malik's lawyer had listed her as a witness one day late. The judge did not consider a continuance or other lesser sanction. During voir dire, Juror 8 said he...
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Procedure, U.S. Const. amend. VI, Washington v. Texas, Chambers v. Mississippi, Brady v. Maryland, Smith v. Phillips
...ay station. Witnesses pointed to Omar, who was running toward an exit and appeared to be holding his waistband. Officers tackled and handcuffed Omar. Without giving Miranda warnings, an officer asked, "Where is the gun?"...
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Procedure, U.S. Const. amend. V, Miranda v. Arizona, New York v. Quarles, Pennsylvania v. Muniz, Rhode Island v. Innis
...dinary inchoate-offense merger rules. NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law, Model Penal Code 5.05
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law, Model Penal Code 5.05
...tal, doctors told police that the victim might need immediate surgery and might not survive. Police brought Sam, who had been stopped nearby with gunshot residue on his jacket, to the victim's hospital room. Sam was hand...
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Procedure, U.S. Const. amend. XIV, Stovall v. Denno, Neil v. Biggers, Manson v. Brathwaite, United States v. Wade
...conspiracy, and renunciation limits. NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law, Model Penal Code 5.02, Model Penal Code 5.03
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law, Model Penal Code 5.02, Model Penal Code 5.03
...r, burglary entry, and intent timing. NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law, Model Penal Code 220.1, Model Penal Code 221.1
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law, Model Penal Code 220.1, Model Penal Code 221.1
...t rule for compelled voice exemplars. NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Procedure, U.S. Const. amend. V, United States v. Dionisio, United States v. Wade
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Procedure, U.S. Const. amend. V, United States v. Dionisio, United States v. Wade
...agency versus proximate-cause limits. NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law, Model Penal Code 210.2
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law, Model Penal Code 210.2
...nspirator substantive-liability rule. NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law
A plaintiff files a state-law negligence action in State A court. Complete diversity and the amount in controversy are present, but one properly joined and served defendant is a citizen of State A. Which statement best d...
Citations: 28 U.S.C. 1441(b)(2)
...vehicle searches incident to arrest. NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Procedure, U.S. Const. amend. IV, Arizona v. Gant
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Procedure, U.S. Const. amend. IV, Arizona v. Gant
...self-representation waiver standard. NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Procedure, U.S. Const. amend. VI, Faretta v. California
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Procedure, U.S. Const. amend. VI, Faretta v. California
...tainer capable of holding contraband. NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Procedure, U.S. Const. amend. IV, California v. Acevedo, United States v. Ross
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Procedure, U.S. Const. amend. IV, California v. Acevedo, United States v. Ross
...rights standing rule for suppression. NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Procedure, U.S. Const. amend. IV, Rakas v. Illinois, Brendlin v. California
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Procedure, U.S. Const. amend. IV, Rakas v. Illinois, Brendlin v. California
A hiker found an arrowhead on federal park land. A criminal statute prohibited removing artifacts from the park, but the hiker had read a private travel website stating that visitors could keep small finds. The hiker too...
Citations: NCBE NextGen UBE Content Scope, Criminal Law, Model Penal Code 2.04
...te F court has contacts with State A and State B. State F's choice-of-law rules select State B substantive law for liability. Which statement best describes the usual treatment of procedure? The correct answer states the...
Citations: Conflict-of-laws principles
Selected State X law gives emergency volunteers immunity unless the plaintiff proves gross negligence by clear and convincing evidence. Forum State F generally uses a preponderance standard in civil cases. How should the...
Citations: Conflict-of-laws principles, Erie doctrine principles
USABarPrep Coach